ccna 200 301 official c

ccna 200 301 official c.OSPFv3 Router with ID (4.4.44) (Process ID 4) Router Link States (Area orADV Router 1.1.1.1 4.4.4.4 Age 258 257 Seq# 0x80000072 0x80000003 Fragment ID Link count 0 1 0 1 Bits B NoneADV Router 4.4.4.4 Age 257 Net Link States (Area 4) Seq# Link ID 0x80000001 4 Rtr count 2Inter Area 3refix Link States (Area 4). ADV RouterAge Seq# Prefix 1.1.1.1 878 0x80000069 2001:DB8:l:l::/64 1.1.1.1 878 0x80000068 2001:DB8:1:2::/64 1.1.1.1 364 0x8000000A 2001:DB8:l:13::/64 1.1. 1.1.1 364 OxSOOOOOOA 2001:DB8:l:23::/64 1.1.1.1 364 0x8000000A 2005E12E64The following is a list of the most important issues that need to be addressed. Lines omitted for brevityTroubleshooting OSPFv3 LSAsIf the two routers do become neighbors, then normally the database exchanges will both work correctly. That is. most problems with OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 occur before the topology database exchange process occurs. By way of review, both routers must first pass all neighbor compatibility checks and reach 2-way status before a topology database exchange can take place. Thus, the configuration problem that prevents routers from becoming neighbors to each other is solved before the database exchange is attempted.In fact, a misconfiguration issue can allow two routers to become neighbors and attempt a database exchange, ending in failure after several minutes of trying. The problem is: the size of the mismatched IPv4 or IPv6 maximum transmission unit (MTU).