ccna 200 301 syllabus of upsc epfo

ccna 200 301 syllabus of upsc epfo.*Mar 100:42:40.455: RIP: buildupdate entries*Mar 1 00:42:40.455: subnet 192.168.1.0 metric 1*Mar 100:42:45.559: RIP:received vlupdate from192.168.1.66onSeriall/1192.168.1.128in1hops*Mar 1 00:42:45.563:From the above output, you can find that R1 sends a route to R2 for 192.168.1.0, but is it 192.168.1.0/24, the primary class network number, or 192.168.1.0/26, the subnet network number? Here is not quite clear, because RIPvl sends routing updates without carrying a subnet mask. But the routing update 192.168.1.128,sent from R2, it can be determined that RIPvl does not automatically generate a summary at the boundary of a non-primary class network.Executing the "debug iprip" command on router R2 shows the following.*Jun 24 00:39:38.391: RIP:received vl update from192.168.1.65 onSeriall/0*Jun 24 00:39:38.391: 192.168.1.0 in 1 hops*Jun 24 00:39:41.447: RIP:sending vl update to 255.255.255.255 via Seriall/0 (192.168.1.66) *Jun 24 00:39:41.451: RIP:buildupdate entries *Jun 24 00 :39:41.451: subnet 192.168.1.128 metric 1From the above output, we can see that the route sent out by R2 is 192.168.1.128, which further verifies that RIPvl does not automatically summarize at the boundary of a non-primary network. R2 received 192.168.1.0 from R1, how does R2 view this route, is it treated as a "/24" or "/26" route entry? Execute the "showip route" command on R2 and it will look like this.