ca like kind exchange form

ca like kind exchange form.Finally, note that the show ipeigrp topology command also lists the two calculated EIGRP metrics in parentheses. The first metric is computed by the local router for that route. The second is the reporting distance (RD): a metric calculated from the perspective of the next-hop router. In the example shown in Figure 10-4, 28 160 is the RD of R1 for this route, which is the metric of the next-hop router 10.1.4.3 (R3). Finding the successor routeUnfortunately, the show ipeigrp topology command does not make it obvious which routes are successor (in other words, the best) routes and which are feasible successor (in other words, loop-free alternatives that are used quickly) routes. The next few pages describe how to view the data in the output of this command and identify the successor and FS routes.First, to be able to explain it clearly, note that the output in Example 10-8 happens to list only the relay routes and not the feasible relay routes. Using all the default bandwidth and delay settings, no routes in this network qualify as feasible successor routes. The next example, 10-11, modifies some of the settings to cause some of the routes to have feasible successors. Now, just note that all the routes listed in Example 10-8 are successor routes.5.2 Foundational Content 213214 Chapter 10 Implementing IPv4 EIGRPThe best way to identify a successor route is that the successor route has the same metric as the FD. The first row of a subnet's topology output lists the FD (that is, the best metric value among all routes that reach this destination subnet). As the name implies, the successor route has the best metric value, so the metric value of the successor route should be equal to the FD. as shown in Figure 10-5, look for the FD on the first row only,and then look for each route that has the same metric value for the first number in parentheses.P 10.1.3.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2172416 successor -------------------------> via 10.1.4.3 (2172416/28160)ISerial0/0/ltIMetric = Feasible Distance (FD) Figure 10-5 Identifying a successor: FD (first row) = Metric (second row)When EIGRP calculates the metric values for all possible routes, sometimes there is a clear winner, so EIGRP selects a successor route (as shown in Figure 10-5). However, it is also possible that the metric values of competing routes on the same subnet are equal. In this case, using the default EIGRP configuration settings, EIGRP supports a feature called "equal load balancing" that tells EIGRP to treat all routes with equal metric values as successor routes.